[slim-vim] ecl-repl 1.0.0 now available

[Brad Beveridge]

Ah, of course!!  I wondered why those mappings were there.  Should the
ECL buffers be unlisted by default?  I think I would perhaps prefer
that.

Brad

On 4/3/06, Larry Clapp <larry at theclapp.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 07:55:20AM -0800, Brad Beveridge wrote:
> > I'll try to get a simple reproducible case tonight.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > When I work with the ECL repl, I usually have the window split, with
> > the ECL REPL in the lower half.  I also use hidden buffers to edit
> > multiple files, and have tab mapped to :bnext to move between them.
> > Unfortunately, this means I move through the REPL and scratch
> > buffers.  You can cause these buffers to be skipped by moving to
> > them and ":set nobuflisted".  However, they are also removed from
> > :ls, so make sure you know what buffer number the REPL and scratch
> > are so you can :b<number> back to it if you accidentally lose that
> > buffer.
>
> :ls! can show you the buffer numbers.  But I saw that problem, too,
> and wrote the rb and lb mappings to get around it.  \rb :sb's to the
> repl buffer and then goes back to the original window; \lb just :sb's
> to the scratch buffer and leaves you there.
>
> Note: "\" is actually <leader>, of course.
>
> -- Larry
>
> _______________________________________________
> slim-vim mailing list
> slim-vim at lispniks.com
> http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/slim-vim
>