[Gardeners] Testing framework for SUL

[C Y]

I should probably mention this:

http://wiki.alu.org/Test_Frameworks


--- Gary Klimowicz <gak at pobox.com> wrote:

> Well, as a lurker whose vote should count next to nothing, I'm  
> particularly fond of lisp-unit.
> 
> That said, I will almost certainly switch to whatever testing  
> framework you choose. I'd like nothing more than to consolidate  
> *that* part of my Standard Utility Library as well.
> 
> -- 
> gak
> 
> 
> On Jun 11, 2006, at 2:29 PM, Chris Dean wrote:
> 
> >
> > One goal we have (well, at least I have) for the Standardized
> Utility
> > Library is to have unit tests for its functions and macros.
> >
> > I'd like to write them using just one unit testing framework, does
> > anyone have a preference of what framework we use?  This is a well
> > discussed area, but if you have a preference and are planning on
> > contributing to this project please cast your vote for your
> favorite
> > testing framework.
> >
> > I was thinking we would use one of:
> >
> > - RT: The classic solution.
> > - FiveAM: Part of the Arnesi suite.
> > - Peter's test framework: A minimalist choice that could grow as we
> >   needed features. From his Practical Common Lisp book
> >   http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/practical-building-a-unit-test- 
> > framework.html
> >
> > Other options are listed here:
> >
> >   http://www.cl-user.net/asp/tags/unit-testing
> >
> > I normally use FiveAM.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris Dean
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gardeners mailing list
> > Gardeners at lispniks.com
> > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gardeners mailing list
> Gardeners at lispniks.com
> http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com