[Gardeners] Project Proposal: Standardized Utility Library

[Ian Eslick]

I'm convinced.  It also eliminates any future licensing and use issues. 

How about a good methodology for attribution and copyright notices?  The
MIT license requires attachment of the license statement to derivative
works, so if someone borrows a function what do they do?  Do we have a
different copyright and license paragraph for each copyright holder?  I
haven't had to worry about this before so I'm not sure what issues arise.

Ian

Chris Dean wrote:
>> Any concerns or preference on a license?  (MIT vs. LLGPL?)
>>     
>
> My preferences is an MIT or BSD style license - it just seems more
> straight forward for Lisp code.  
>
> Cheers,
> Chris Dean
>