[Gardeners] Mangling the hyperspec

[Matthew D Swank]

Peter Herth wrote:

> The hyperspec has its place as the pure technical reference. Of
> course, with a complex language like Common Lisp, this makes for a
> complex documentation. 

This may seem strange, but the text of Common Lisp the Language, 2nd 
edition is quite readable (and searchable in pdf form).  Of course it's 
a little out of date.  I know they share a lot of language, but is it 
any less encumbered than the Hyperspec?

Matt
-- 
"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to 
your grandmother." — Albert Einstein.