[Gardeners] Mangling the Hyperspec

[Paolo Amoroso]

tin gherdanarra <tinman31337 at gmail.com> writes:

> I'm somewhat incontent with the hyperspec. It lacks examples
> and the wording reminds me to that of CCCITT-lawyers. I guess
> the traffic on comp.lang.lisp would drop by 50 % if there was
> a better hyperspec. So here is an idea.

As far as I know, the ANSI CL standard, on which the text of the
HyperSpec is based, is often praised as a good technical document.


> BUT: There are legal issues involved. I'm pretty sure lisp.org

There are more legal issues and implications than you think.


Paolo
-- 
Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log