[cl-faq] cl-faq Digest, Vol 9, Issue 1

[Chris Russell]

>
>
> On 2006-11-28, Larry Clapp wrote:
> > *** I have this cool idea for a new Lisp dialect / Lisp syntax that
> > doesn't involve so many parentheses!  It uses indentation to show
> > structure!
>
> New answer committed.  See here[1].
>
> -- L
>
> [1] http://www.theclapp.org/lisp/lispfaq/faq.html#s2q5
>
>
> This is probably nitpicking, but shouldn't the arrows on the tree go the
other way around? As in we put 1 and 2 into * which we put into +  ?

I'm sure someone is going to make a case for the arrows going the current
way now ;) .

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.lispniks.com/pipermail/cl-faq/attachments/20061205/33564083/attachment.html