[ab] Qt Bindings for the builder

[Justin Heyes-Jones]

Hi Gustavo

Just to be clear, the intent of the lispbuilder license is to allow
people to create commercial applications without having to release the
full source code of their application, which GPL would need.

But even if your Qt bindings are not compatible with our license it
will still be very useful to have available and compatible with our
code.

Justin

On 02/08/07, Gustavo <gugamilare at gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand why you want Application Builder to have a BSD-style license.
> Maybe I don't agree, but I understand. I've only known the difference
> between BSD and GPL after I wrote the first e-mail. But we are intending to
> make a GPL maker, and that's why we will use Qt libraries (and SBCL) without
> regrets.
> So, we will make Qt bindings, and, off course, some macros that can handle
> the code in a "lispier" way, and we could, after that, adapt the same macros
> (and some other code) to work with the wxWidgets too, so we will also help
> the builder. If some Application Builder user wants to use Qt (and make the
> code GPL or buy a Qt license), he/she will have this freedom. Otherwise,
> he/she could use (with, perhaps, few changes in the final code) the
> wxWidgets. This way, everyone will be happy. :-)
> If you like the idea, as we hope, we'll do it with pleasure. Otherwise,
> we'll make these bindings just for our maker.
>
> --
>
> 2007/8/2, Frank Buss < fb at frank-buss.de>:
> > A Qt binding for Lisp may be useful for some applications. The licensing
> > model of Qt is not compatible with the Application Builder packages (Qt
> > requires GPL for open source projects and you have to buy a license for
> > commercial projects, Application Builder is BSD), but this is no problem,
> if
> > we don't bundle Qt with the bindings. Maybe would be a good idea to see
> what
> > is already available, e.g. a Google search for Qt Lisp gives some tests
> with
> > Fetter and a Sourceforge project in version 0.2.
> >
> > What about using wxWidgets? Looks like there is already a Lisp binding for
> > it: http://www.wxcl-project.org/language/en/ I didn't
> tested it, but it has
> > some promising screenshots and the wxWidgets license is less viral. Maybe
> we
> > could bundle it together with the other Application Builder packages, with
> > an installer like http://weitz.de/starter-pack/
> >
> > --
> > Frank Buss, fb at frank-buss.de
> > http://www.frank-buss.de, http://www.it4-systems.de
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > application-builder mailing list
> > application-builder at lispniks.com
> >
> http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> application-builder mailing list
> application-builder at lispniks.com
> http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
>
>