[ab] Hosting

[Surendra Singhi]

Hi,

"Frank Buss" <fb at frank-buss.de> writes:

> Justin Heyes-Jones wrote: 
>
>> The advantages are the obvious reliablity (both uptime and speed) of
>> google infrastructure. (I've noticed a lot of downtime and slowness on
>> sourceforge.) The bug (or issue) tracking is very simple, very
>> visible, and easy to use.
>
> Sourceforge has sometimes problems, but most of the time it works. But I
> don't care, where the repository is, and you may be right that Google is
> more reliable.
>
What about http://common-lisp.net/ the defacto place where common lisp
projects are hosted. They have SVN, and Trac, which IMO is much better than
sourceforge for bugs and issue tracking and as a bonus has a wiki also. 

My 2 cents.

Regards,

-- 
Surendra Singhi
http://ssinghi.kreeti.com, http://www.kreeti.com
Read my blog at: http://cuttingtheredtape.blogspot.com/
,----
| Great wits are sure to madness near allied,
| And thin partitions do their bounds divide.
| 
|     (John Dryden, Absalom and Achitophel, 1681)
`----